Senate Advances Short-Term Spending Measure

Why it matters locally: The federal disaster aid provision within this short-term spending measure could directly impact Mississippi, which frequently experiences severe weather events and relies on federal assistance for recovery efforts.

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Senate voted Wednesday to advance a short-term spending bill, moving the measure closer to final passage. The procedural vote, which required 60 votes, passed 87-11. This result indicates broad bipartisan support for the legislation, which aims to fund government operations temporarily. The bill now faces a final vote in the Senate. If it passes, the measure will proceed to the House of Representatives for consideration. Congress faces a deadline this week to pass new funding legislation or risk a partial government shutdown. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer confirmed a deal had been reached with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to address government funding. Senator Schumer stated, "We have a deal to avert a shutdown," highlighting ongoing negotiations between congressional leaders. The proposed legislation includes a temporary extension of funding for various government agencies. It also incorporates a provision for federal disaster aid. However, the bill does not include new funding for Ukraine, a point of contention for some lawmakers. Republicans in both chambers have expressed concerns regarding overall spending levels and the national debt. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene stated her intention to oppose the measure, referencing Speaker McCarthy's prior commitments on spending. She said, "I will not be voting for a clean continuing resolution." Democrats also voiced objections to certain aspects of the bill. Representative Rosa DeLauro, a Democrat from Connecticut, criticized the omission of certain provisions, stating, "I am very disappointed that it does not contain the supplemental appropriations requested for Ukraine, for disaster relief, and for child care." She reiterated the Democratic Party's support for including these additional funds. Following the procedural vote, some Republican senators expressed criticism regarding the White House's approach to science funding within the broader budget discussions.