Supreme Court Considers Jurisdiction in Climate Change Lawsuit

Why it matters locally: California, a state that has experienced significant impacts from climate change and has numerous ongoing climate-related initiatives, could see the trajectory of its own climate litigation efforts significantly altered by the Supreme Court's decision on jurisdictional matters. Several California municipalities and counties have filed similar lawsuits against fossil fuel companies, and this ruling will determine whether such cases will be heard in state or federal courts.

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court today heard arguments in a case stemming from a lawsuit filed by Boulder, Colorado, against energy companies. This hearing marks the first day of the court's new term and centers on a jurisdictional question: whether such climate change-related lawsuits belong in state or federal court systems. Boulder's lawsuit seeks damages from fossil fuel companies, alleging their contributions to climate change have resulted in local impacts. The outcome of this case could establish a precedent for other similar lawsuits filed by municipalities and states across the country. Legal representatives for Boulder presented arguments supporting the suit's placement in state courts. Attorneys for the energy companies contended the cases involve complex federal questions and should proceed in federal courts. The justices questioned both sides regarding the scope and nature of the claims. The court did not immediately issue a ruling. A decision on the jurisdictional question is expected later in the term.