Skip to main content
Day.News — Local News. Real Community.
COLUMBUS DAY NEWS
Local News. Real Community.
Trump Seeks Supreme Court Review of E. Jean Carroll Defamation Award
politics
1 min read

Trump Seeks Supreme Court Review of E. Jean Carroll Defamation Award

Former President Donald Trump has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn an $83.3 million defamation judgment. His legal team asserts that he holds immunity for public statements made during his presidency.

08/23/2026 · Arkansas edition

Advertisement

Advertisement

WASHINGTON D.C. – Former President Donald Trump has filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging an $83.3 million defamation award granted to writer E. Jean Carroll. Trump's lawyers submitted the application, contending that presidential immunity protects him from civil liability for statements issued while he held office.

The application specifically requests a stay on the enforcement of the judgment. A federal jury in New York City determined in January that Trump defamed Carroll and awarded her compensatory and punitive damages.

Carroll originally filed her defamation lawsuit in 2019, alleging Trump damaged her reputation after she publicly accused him of sexual assault. Trump consistently denied the allegations, stating he did not know Carroll and that her claims were fabricated.

During the trial, Trump's legal counsel maintained that his remarks fell within his official duties as president. They argued that public officials require broad immunity to perform their roles without fear of constant litigation.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who presided over the New York trial, rejected the immunity argument. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals also previously ruled against Trump's claim of absolute immunity in the case.

The Supreme Court now faces a decision on whether to hear the appeal. If the court accepts the case, it could establish a precedent regarding the scope of presidential immunity in defamation claims.

Related Topics

Editorial Transparency
AI-Generated · Written by National Desk

Article Ratings

Factual
0.0
Likeable
0.0
Bias
0.0
Objective
0.0

How do you feel about this story?

NA

National Desk

Trust 3.1104047 articles8,231,170 views75% fact accuracy
View Profile

Sign in to follow this author from their profile.

Discussion (0)

Join the Conversation

Join the conversation

Sign in to share your thoughts, reply to readers, and like comments.

Sign in to comment
Sort by:
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Trending Now

Trending stories will appear here.

More from Arkansas

No other local stories are available right now.

Events & Things to Do

Read section →

Upcoming events will appear here.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Keep Reading

Related Stories

More politics stories from Arkansas

politics

DNC Files Lawsuit Against Administration Over Agency-Funded Advertising

The Democratic National Committee has initiated legal action against the administration, claiming the use of taxpayer funds for advertisements featuring former President Donald Trump. The lawsuit centers on ads produced by federal agencies that the DNC characterizes as political endorsements.

Read Story →
politics

DNC Sues Trump Administration Over Advertising Expenditures

The Democratic National Committee filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday. The DNC alleges that recent television advertisements promoting the president's political message used millions in taxpayer dollars inappropriately. This legal action targets the administration's use of government funds for what the DNC describes as political advertising.

Read Story →
politics

Strategists Discuss Midterm Election Messaging, Expected Outcomes

With midterm elections approaching, Democratic and Republican strategists have discussed their parties' final campaign messages. They also identified key states where they anticipate electoral success.

Read Story →
politics

Reporter Highlights Senior Officer Promotions and Transgender Policy

A recent report details observations regarding military promotions and policy changes. The analysis focuses on the advancement of Black and women senior officers, alongside a policy affecting transgender service members.

Read Story →
politics

Supreme Court Justices Weigh Investment Comparisons in Retirement Fund Case

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case concerning the investment strategies of employee retirement funds. Justices explored how to compare the performance of different investment approaches, particularly when assessing alleged fiduciary imprudence. The central discussion revolved around the necessity of comparing similar investment strategies.

Read Story →
politics

Supreme Court to Hear Asylum Case on Green Card Eligibility

The Supreme Court will review a case concerning whether asylum recipients must maintain their asylum status to qualify for permanent residency. The Justice Department argues current status is required, while petitioners contend the law focuses on a past grant of asylum.

Read Story →
Scroll for more stories