Skip to main content
Day.News — Local News. Real Community.
COLUMBUS DAY NEWS
Local News. Real Community.
politics
3 min read

Supreme Court Upholds Mississippi Law Allowing Ballots Counted Up to Five Days After Election

The Supreme Court sided with Mississippi on Monday, allowing the state to count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received within five days after. The 5-4 decision rejected challenges from the Republican National Committee and other groups who argued federal law required ballots to arrive on Election Day itself.

07/13/2026 · Mississippi edition

Advertisement

Advertisement

Why it matters locally: The ruling directly upholds Mississippi's 2020 election law, allowing the state to continue counting mail-in ballots received up to five days after Election Day if postmarked by Election Day. The decision resolves a legal challenge that could have forced Mississippi to change its voting procedures ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

The Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law Monday that permits election officials to count mail-in ballots received up to five days after Election Day, provided they carry an Election Day postmark. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the five-justice majority in *Watson v. Republican National Committee*, concluding that federal election-day statutes do not establish a deadline for when ballots must arrive at election offices, only when voters must cast them. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined her opinion. Barrett stated that "the election-day statutes require the electorate's choice to be made on election day. That occurs so long as election day is the deadline for individuals to vote—as it is in Mississippi. But the election-day statutes do not set a deadline for ballot receipt." The Republican National Committee, Mississippi Republican Party, a state voter, and a county election official challenged the law in federal court in Gulfport. The Libertarian Party of Mississippi filed a related lawsuit weeks later, and the cases were combined. The challengers argued the Mississippi rule conflicted with an 1845 federal law designating the Tuesday after the first Monday in November as Election Day. A federal district judge upheld the law, finding that Congress established a national Election Day to prevent voters from casting ballots in different states on different days and to ensure earlier election results did not influence later ones. The judge concluded neither concern applied to a five-day window for ballots postmarked by Election Day. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed that decision, holding that federal law required all ballots to arrive by Election Day. Mississippi appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case in November. Barrett rejected the argument that 19th-century election-day laws necessarily reflected 19th-century voting practices. She noted the theory would threaten early voting itself, since polls historically opened only on Election Day. "Historical practice, detached from statutory text, is not controlling," she wrote. Barrett also pointed to a federal law requiring states to allow military and overseas voters to cast absentee ballots. That statute "presupposes that the deadline for ballot receipt is uniformly a matter of state law," she wrote, and "would make little sense" if ballots had to arrive by Election Day. She dismissed arguments that Election Day receipt requirements protect election integrity as policy matters for legislatures, not courts. "The question today is not whether requiring ballots to be received by election day is a good or bad idea; the question is whether the idea has made its way into the United States Code." Justice Samuel Alito dissented, arguing that historically, completing an election on a particular day meant collecting ballots on that day. Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch joined his opinion. Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined most of Alito's dissent. Alito acknowledged that mail voting and early voting are now widespread and lawful. He contended, however, that federal law requires the critical act—collection of all ballots—to occur on Election Day, as it did when voting happened only in person. Mississippi adopted the law in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The decision comes four months before the 2026 midterm elections.

Related Topics

Editorial Transparency
AI-Generated · Written by National Desk

Article Ratings

Factual
0.0
Likeable
0.0
Bias
0.0
Objective
0.0

How do you feel about this story?

NA

National Desk

Trust 3.1104519 articles8,225,872 views75% fact accuracy
View Profile

Sign in to follow this author from their profile.

Discussion (0)

Join the Conversation

Join the conversation

Sign in to share your thoughts, reply to readers, and like comments.

Sign in to comment
Sort by:
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Trending Now

Trending stories will appear here.

More from Mississippi

No other local stories are available right now.

Events & Things to Do

Read section →

Upcoming events will appear here.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Keep Reading

Related Stories

More politics stories from Mississippi

politics

Supreme Court Intervenes in Political Ad Rate Dispute

The Supreme Court has re-entered a dispute regarding broadcast advertising rates for political parties and joint fundraising committees. Chief Justice John Roberts issued an interim stay on a lower court's directive to the FCC, marking the second time the high court has addressed the matter this election cycle.

Read Story →
politics

Social Security's Future Emerges as Key Political Topic

Political figures have begun addressing the financial future of Social Security. The program faces projections of depleted reserves within a decade, prompting calls for legislative action. The approaching presidential election cycle brings the issue into sharper focus.

Read Story →
politics

Parties Focus Resources on Key House Districts for 2026 Elections

Both major political parties are directing substantial financial resources toward approximately 60 House districts. These districts, where Donald Trump secured an average 9-point lead in the 2024 election, could prove decisive in the contest for control of the House of Representatives.

Read Story →
politics

Republicans Assess Campaign Spending as Midterm Elections Approach

Republicans entered the final month of the midterm campaign with access to over $1 billion for election efforts. Party members are assessing the effectiveness of these funds in the context of voter sentiment regarding former President Donald Trump, rising consumer costs, and the conflict in Iran.

Read Story →
politics

DNC Files Lawsuit Against Administration Over Agency-Funded Advertising

The Democratic National Committee has initiated legal action against the administration, claiming the use of taxpayer funds for advertisements featuring former President Donald Trump. The lawsuit centers on ads produced by federal agencies that the DNC characterizes as political endorsements.

Read Story →
politics

DNC Sues Trump Administration Over Advertising Expenditures

The Democratic National Committee filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday. The DNC alleges that recent television advertisements promoting the president's political message used millions in taxpayer dollars inappropriately. This legal action targets the administration's use of government funds for what the DNC describes as political advertising.

Read Story →
Scroll for more stories