Skip to main content
Day.News — Local News. Real Community.
COLUMBUS DAY NEWS
Local News. Real Community.
politics
1 min read

Supreme Court Upholds Access to Abortion Pill Mifepristone Via Telehealth

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday to maintain access to the abortion pill mifepristone via telehealth and mail. The decision rejects a challenge to the Food and Drug Administration's regulations on the drug. The ruling means that patients can continue to receive mifepristone prescriptions remotely and through the mail.

06/11/2026 · South Dakota edition

Advertisement

Advertisement

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Thursday that the abortion pill mifepristone will remain available for prescription via online or phone consultation and can be sent through the mail.

The court's decision rejected a challenge to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) regulations governing the distribution of mifepristone. The challenge questioned the overall FDA authorization of the abortion pill.

The ruling ensures that current practices for accessing mifepristone will continue, allowing individuals to receive prescriptions remotely and obtain the medication through the mail.

Related Topics

Editorial Transparency
AI-Generated · Written by National Desk

Article Ratings

Factual
0.0
Likeable
0.0
Bias
0.0
Objective
0.0

How do you feel about this story?

NA

National Desk

Trust 3.1104047 articles8,231,170 views75% fact accuracy
View Profile

Sign in to follow this author from their profile.

Discussion (0)

Join the Conversation

Join the conversation

Sign in to share your thoughts, reply to readers, and like comments.

Sign in to comment
Sort by:
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Trending Now

Trending stories will appear here.

More from South Dakota

No other local stories are available right now.

Events & Things to Do

Read section →

Upcoming events will appear here.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Keep Reading

Related Stories

More politics stories from South Dakota

politics

DNC Files Lawsuit Against Administration Over Agency-Funded Advertising

The Democratic National Committee has initiated legal action against the administration, claiming the use of taxpayer funds for advertisements featuring former President Donald Trump. The lawsuit centers on ads produced by federal agencies that the DNC characterizes as political endorsements.

Read Story →
politics

DNC Sues Trump Administration Over Advertising Expenditures

The Democratic National Committee filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday. The DNC alleges that recent television advertisements promoting the president's political message used millions in taxpayer dollars inappropriately. This legal action targets the administration's use of government funds for what the DNC describes as political advertising.

Read Story →
politics

Trump Addresses Iran Comments at Texas Rally

President Trump discussed comments he made about Iran at a recent rally in San Antonio, Texas. He addressed previous statements regarding Iran's potential actions and the protection of American cities.

Read Story →
politics

Strategists Discuss Midterm Election Messaging, Expected Outcomes

With midterm elections approaching, Democratic and Republican strategists have discussed their parties' final campaign messages. They also identified key states where they anticipate electoral success.

Read Story →
politics

Supreme Court Justices Weigh Investment Comparisons in Retirement Fund Case

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case concerning the investment strategies of employee retirement funds. Justices explored how to compare the performance of different investment approaches, particularly when assessing alleged fiduciary imprudence. The central discussion revolved around the necessity of comparing similar investment strategies.

Read Story →
politics

Supreme Court to Hear Asylum Case on Green Card Eligibility

The Supreme Court will review a case concerning whether asylum recipients must maintain their asylum status to qualify for permanent residency. The Justice Department argues current status is required, while petitioners contend the law focuses on a past grant of asylum.

Read Story →
Scroll for more stories