Skip to main content
Day.News — Local News. Real Community.
COLUMBUS DAY NEWS
Local News. Real Community.
politics
2 min read

Supreme Court History Includes Instances of Leaked Information

The Supreme Court has experienced leaks of internal information throughout its history. These disclosures have ranged from advance notice of decisions to behind-the-scenes accounts of deliberations.

06/12/2026 · Minnesota edition

Advertisement

Advertisement

The New York Times published an article in April detailing the Supreme Court's 2016 decision to block President Barack Obama's Clean Power Plan, based on leaked internal memos. The article highlighted the use of the court's "shadow docket."

One of the most prominent instances of leaked information occurred in May 2022, when Politico published a draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito in *Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization*. The draft indicated the court's intention to overturn *Roe v. Wade*, which established a constitutional right to abortion.

The Supreme Court confirmed the authenticity of the leaked draft opinion and initiated an investigation led by the court's marshal, Gail Curley. A report released in January 2023 stated that the investigation was unable to identify the source of the leak.

Prior to the *Dobbs* leak, similar disclosures occurred. In the 1850s, the New York Tribune reported the Supreme Court's decision in a dispute involving the Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Company in both 1852 and 1854, before the official rulings.

In 1920, Justice Joseph McKenna's former law clerk, Ashton Embry, faced indictment for allegedly leaking a Supreme Court decision involving Southern Pacific Railroad to investors. The investors then profited by selling the company's stock before the decision became public. The indictment was later dismissed.

In 1972, The Washington Post published an article describing the internal deliberations surrounding *Roe v. Wade*, including the initial vote count and Chief Justice Warren Burger's efforts to delay the decision. The article referenced private notes and memoranda exchanged among the justices.

In 1973, a law clerk shared the *Roe v. Wade* decision with Time magazine before its official release. Time published the story before the court's announcement.

Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong published *The Brethren* in 1979, providing an account of Warren Burger's early years as chief justice. Edward Lazarus's *Closed Chambers*, published in 1998, detailed his experiences as a law clerk for Justice Harry Blackmun.

In October 2004, law clerks involved in the *Bush v. Gore* decision spoke with reporters from Vanity Fair.

In 2012, CBS News reported that Chief Justice John Roberts initially sided with conservative justices to strike down the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate but later changed his position. The report cited sources with knowledge of the deliberations.

CNN reported in 2019 that Roberts changed his vote regarding the inclusion of a citizenship question on the 2020 census, citing sources familiar with the Supreme Court's private deliberations.

In December 2023, The New York Times reported details about the *Dobbs* decision, including that Justice Amy Coney Barrett initially voted against taking the case.

In 2024, The New York Times reported on the Supreme Court's decision regarding presidential immunity for former President Donald Trump.

Related Topics

Editorial Transparency
AI-Generated · Written by National Desk

Article Ratings

Factual
0.0
Likeable
0.0
Bias
0.0
Objective
0.0

How do you feel about this story?

NA

National Desk

Trust 3.1102445 articles8,231,170 views75% fact accuracy
View Profile

Sign in to follow this author from their profile.

Discussion (0)

Join the Conversation

Join the conversation

Sign in to share your thoughts, reply to readers, and like comments.

Sign in to comment
Sort by:
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Trending Now

Trending stories will appear here.

More from Minnesota

No other local stories are available right now.

Events & Things to Do

Read section →

Upcoming events will appear here.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Keep Reading

Related Stories

More politics stories from Minnesota

politics

Supreme Court Considers State Lawsuits Against Energy Companies Over Climate Change Costs

The Supreme Court opened its term by hearing arguments in a lawsuit from Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies responsible for climate change impacts. The case challenges whether state law claims of this nature are preempted by federal law. The outcome remains unclear after the initial hearing.

Read Story →
politics

Democrats Eye Senate Control for Supreme Court Vacancy Influence

Democrats calculate they need four additional Senate seats to control judicial appointments. This possibility arises as Justice Samuel Alito has reportedly considered retirement. Such a scenario would significantly alter the dynamics of Supreme Court vacancies.

Read Story →
politics

Supreme Court Considers Climate Liability Cases

The Supreme Court began its new term by examining cases that aim to assign liability to energy companies for damages attributed to climate change. These proceedings mark an early focus on environmental litigation for the high court.

Read Story →
politics

Analysts Discuss Trump's Campaign Pledges and GOP Spending Strategies

Political analysts Tamara Keith and Amy Walter discussed recent political developments, including former President Donald Trump's campaign pledges for midterm elections. They also reviewed Republican spending on campaign defenses in traditionally conservative districts and a White House decision regarding press access.

Read Story →
politics

Supreme Court Considers Climate Liability Case Involving Energy Companies

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that examines the legal responsibility of energy companies for climate change. Officials in Boulder, Colorado, seek compensation from these companies for costs associated with natural disasters.

Read Story →
politics

Supreme Court Opens New Term, Hears First Arguments

The Supreme Court commenced its new term on the first Monday in October, hearing arguments in two cases concerning energy companies' liability for climate change and federal court review of veterans' disability benefits. The Court also released its initial order list, detailing denied petitions from the 'long conference.'

Read Story →
Scroll for more stories