business
5 min read
Labor Secretary Chavez-DeRemer Resigns Amid Scandal, Third Cabinet Exit
National Desk
April 21, 2026
Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer resigned on Monday, April 20, 2026, according to three sources familiar with the matter, following a Labor Department inspector general probe into serious misconduct allegations.[1][2][4] The investigation stemmed from a whistleblower complaint accusing her of an extramarital affair with a security team member, drinking alcohol on the job and directing staff to falsify official travel for personal trips at taxpayer expense.[1][2][5] Multiple staffers have already resigned or been placed on administrative leave amid the ongoing scrutiny.[1][4]
White House Communications Director Steven Cheung confirmed the exit in a post on X, framing it positively: "Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer will be leaving the Administration to take a position in the private sector. She has done a phenomenal job in her role by protecting American workers, enacting fair labor practices, and helping Americans gain additional skills to improve their lives."[1][3][4] Keith Sonderling, a deputy under Chavez-DeRemer, was named acting secretary, though no permanent replacement has been announced.[1][2][5]
Chavez-DeRemer, a former GOP congresswoman from Oregon who represented a swing district, won rare bipartisan union support during her career and was confirmed to the Cabinet by a 67-32 Senate vote in March 2025.[5] Her tenure saw the Trump administration cancel millions in international Labor Department grants aimed at combating child and slave labor abroad, ending programs that had contributed to a 78 million reduction in global child laborers over two decades.[5]
The resignation marks the third Cabinet departure since January 2026, all involving women: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was fired in March, followed by Attorney General Pam Bondi earlier this month.[1][5] Coming ahead of midterm elections, the exits signal a soft shake-up in Trump's administration as it navigates economic policy amid workforce challenges.[1][6]

Discussion (0)
Join the Conversation
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!