Florida Couple to Keep Baby Born From Embryo Mix-Up at IVF Clinic

Why it matters locally: This case, involving a Florida couple and an IVF clinic within the state, highlights potential vulnerabilities in medical procedures and regulatory oversight for fertility services directly affecting Floridians seeking reproductive assistance.

---

A Florida couple entangled in an embryo mix-up at an IVF clinic will retain custody of their infant, according to a custody agreement they reached with the child's biological parents. Tiffany Score and Steven Mills welcomed the baby after the clinic implanted an embryo that did not contain their genetic material. The error prompted a custody dispute between the two couples. The agreement allows Score and Mills to keep the child. Terms of the arrangement were not disclosed. Embryos are stored and tracked at fertility clinics as part of in vitro fertilization treatment. Errors in embryo identification, while rare, have prompted lawsuits and custody battles when they occur. The case highlights the potential complications that can arise during IVF procedures, where embryos created outside the body are selected and implanted. Clinics maintain protocols to prevent mix-ups, though documentation and identification systems vary across facilities. Details about how the mix-up occurred at the Florida clinic were not provided. The biological parents' identities and their reasoning for the agreement were not disclosed. Custody arrangements in embryo mix-up cases depend on the circumstances and preferences of both couples involved. Some cases have resulted in legal settlements, while others have prompted changes to clinic procedures. The case comes amid broader scrutiny of fertility clinic operations and quality control measures. Patient advocacy groups have called for stronger oversight of embryo tracking systems and more transparent incident reporting across the fertility industry. Score and Mills' agreement to keep the child resolves the immediate custody question, though legal experts note that such arrangements do not necessarily address broader questions about clinic liability or whether additional regulatory measures should apply to fertility facilities.