Federal Judge Blocks Postal Service Mail-In Voting Changes

Why it matters locally: This nationwide injunction directly impacts mail-in voting procedures in Maryland, ensuring that the U.S. Postal Service must prioritize election mail and treat all election-related correspondence as First-Class mail, regardless of postage paid. This ruling aims to safeguard the integrity and timely delivery of ballots for Maryland residents.

---

A federal judge has issued a nationwide injunction, halting the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from implementing operational changes that officials said could affect mail-in voting. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled on Monday, September 21, that the Postal Service must prioritize election-related mail. The injunction specifically prevents the USPS from executing directives issued in July by Postmaster General Louis DeJoy. These directives included restricting employee overtime and limiting extra trips for mail delivery. Judge Sullivan's order mandates that all election mail must be treated as First-Class mail, regardless of the postage paid. Judge Sullivan criticized the Postal Service's leadership, stating that the changes were "likely to irreparably harm the right to vote." He further stated that "the right to vote is too vital a cornerstone of our democracy to be made an experiment." The judge’s order requires the Postal Service to take all necessary measures to ensure the timely delivery of election mail. This ruling follows similar decisions in other federal courts. On September 17, federal judges in Pennsylvania and Washington state also issued injunctions against the same USPS policy changes. These previous rulings came in response to lawsuits filed by several states, alleging that the changes were politically motivated and threatened the integrity of the upcoming election. Postmaster General DeJoy testified before Congress in August, stating that the USPS would suspend some operational changes until after the election. However, legal challenges continued, with states seeking court orders to formally block the changes.