Skip to main content
Day.News — Local News. Real Community.
COLUMBUS DAY NEWS
Local News. Real Community.
politics
1 min read

DOJ Issues Warning to State Election Officials Regarding Noncitizen Voting

The Department of Justice has informed state election officials that noncitizen voting could lead to arrests. Officials received five days to outline their adherence to laws prohibiting such votes. This communication was part of a larger directive from the federal agency.

07/23/2026 · Michigan edition

Advertisement

Advertisement

Why it matters locally: While Michigan law already prohibits non-citizens from voting, this federal directive places additional scrutiny on the procedures and safeguards employed by the Michigan Bureau of Elections to maintain the integrity of voter rolls.

WASHINGTON D.C. — The Department of Justice (DOJ) has communicated to more than a dozen state election officials, indicating that casting of a single noncitizen vote in their respective states could result in arrests. The DOJ issued a letter, giving these officials a five-day period to provide specifics on how they plan to comply with existing laws concerning noncitizens participating in elections. Jessica Huseman of Votebeat obtained the letter and discussed its contents. The communication from the DOJ outlined the federal government's position on preventing noncitizen suffrage. The directive from the Department of Justice mandates that state election administrators detail the procedures and safeguards they have in place to prevent individuals who are not U.S. citizens from registering or casting ballots in federal elections. Federal law prohibits noncitizens from voting in elections for federal offices. States are responsible for maintaining voter rolls and implementing election procedures in line with these statutes. The DOJ's letter emphasizes the potential legal consequences for state officials should these laws be violated.

Related Topics

Editorial Transparency
AI-Generated · Written by National Desk

Article Ratings

Factual
0.0
Likeable
0.0
Bias
0.0
Objective
0.0

How do you feel about this story?

NA

National Desk

Trust 3.1103384 articles8,231,170 views75% fact accuracy
View Profile

Sign in to follow this author from their profile.

Discussion (0)

Join the Conversation

Join the conversation

Sign in to share your thoughts, reply to readers, and like comments.

Sign in to comment
Sort by:
0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Trending Now

Trending stories will appear here.

More from Michigan

No other local stories are available right now.

Events & Things to Do

Read section →

Upcoming events will appear here.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Keep Reading

Related Stories

More politics stories from Michigan

politics

DNC Files Lawsuit Against Administration Over Agency-Funded Advertising

The Democratic National Committee has initiated legal action against the administration, claiming the use of taxpayer funds for advertisements featuring former President Donald Trump. The lawsuit centers on ads produced by federal agencies that the DNC characterizes as political endorsements.

Read Story →
politics

DNC Sues Trump Administration Over Advertising Expenditures

The Democratic National Committee filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday. The DNC alleges that recent television advertisements promoting the president's political message used millions in taxpayer dollars inappropriately. This legal action targets the administration's use of government funds for what the DNC describes as political advertising.

Read Story →
politics

Strategists Discuss Midterm Election Messaging, Expected Outcomes

With midterm elections approaching, Democratic and Republican strategists have discussed their parties' final campaign messages. They also identified key states where they anticipate electoral success.

Read Story →
politics

Reporter Highlights Senior Officer Promotions and Transgender Policy

A recent report details observations regarding military promotions and policy changes. The analysis focuses on the advancement of Black and women senior officers, alongside a policy affecting transgender service members.

Read Story →
politics

Supreme Court Justices Weigh Investment Comparisons in Retirement Fund Case

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case concerning the investment strategies of employee retirement funds. Justices explored how to compare the performance of different investment approaches, particularly when assessing alleged fiduciary imprudence. The central discussion revolved around the necessity of comparing similar investment strategies.

Read Story →
politics

Supreme Court to Hear Asylum Case on Green Card Eligibility

The Supreme Court will review a case concerning whether asylum recipients must maintain their asylum status to qualify for permanent residency. The Justice Department argues current status is required, while petitioners contend the law focuses on a past grant of asylum.

Read Story →
Scroll for more stories